How can you optimize prices in a changing market?
At a glance:
“You name the price, I’ll name the terms.” Because price is only one dial. The rest of the deal (deposits, milestones, term length, payment schedule) quietly decides who shows up, who flakes, how much risk you carry, and how fast cash hits the bank.
WHAT IT IS
Deposits, commitments, and payment terms are all the ways money and risk move around the list price: non-refundable or partially refundable deposits, milestone schedules, early-pay discounts, “pay-in-four” plans, contract length, escalation clauses, cancellation rules. Together, they form a pricing system that screens who you work with, shapes follow-through, and trades price against time, risk, and effort.
WHY IT MATTERS
They change behavior. Deposit contracts and similar “money at stake” tools reliably increase follow-through in settings from gym attendance to medical check-ups, because people hate losing their own money.
They protect capacity. Non-trivial deposits and clear cancellation terms reduce no-shows and last-minute changes when capacity is scarce.
They improve cash flow without price cuts. Early-pay discounts and milestone billing can yield financing economics equivalent to a high APR for us while leaving the headline price intact.
They segment by commitment, not just by WTP. Flexible deposits or installment options attract more cautious customers, while stricter terms screen for those who value priority, speed, or customization.
CASE FILE
AWS: Early-Pay Discount at Cloud Scale
“A flexible pricing model that offer[s] low prices…in exchange for a commitment to a consistent amount of usage (measured in $/hour) for a 1 or 3 year term.”
— AWS Compute and EC2 Instance Savings Plans
Setup. Cloud buyers hate two things: Volatile bills and long-term lock-in. Cloud sellers hate one thing: unpredictable demand. AWS’s core challenge was how to let customers keep operational flexibility while still nudging them toward serious commitment (without cutting the list price for everyone).
Move. AWS turned “payment terms” into a product menu. Instead of a single compute price, customers choose how much commitment they’ll stake:
On-Demand: Pay as you go.
Savings Plans: Commit to a steady spend rate for 1 or 3 years; AWS charges the discounted rate up to that commitment.
Reserved Instances: Commit to a specific configuration for 1 or 3 years, with explicit payment terms (where higher upfront payment generally buys a bigger discount).
This is deposits/prepay logic in B2B clothing: Pay earlier/commit longer → earn a better deal.
Outcome. AWS documents savings of up to 72% over On-Demand, providing a powerful argument for swapping flexibility for savings.
Lessons.
When buyers fight the headline number, trade on terms instead. Commitment length + upfront payment are pricing levers that 1. Screen for seriousness, 2. Improve cash-flow predictability, and 3. Reduce churn-y usage without discounting the brand by dropping list price.
Framework:
-
When a buyer stakes their own money, backing out turns a hypothetical future cost into a certain loss – and people hate certain losses about twice as much as they like equivalent gains (classic loss-aversion). That “I’d be wasting my own money” feeling, plus a mild sunk-cost effect, is what makes deposits reduce no-shows and late cancels across settings from gyms to medical appointments.
Takeaway: Use deposits when the real risk is flakiness or last-minute churn; you’re selling commitment, not extra revenue.
-
Field experiments with health and exercise programs find that modest deposits – on the order of a day or two of wages or a small slice of monthly pay – materially raise follow-through but attract only a minority of people to opt in.
Takeaway: Start by testing deposits of roughly 5%-30% of the contract or one usage cycle, then let results tell you if you’re too light or too heavy.
-
“Pay-in-4” style plans have exploded because they lower the immediate pain of paying, increasing purchase incidence and basket size by easing perceived financial constraints. But, longer and more complex installment plans are associated with higher delinquency and consumer distress, so understand what your safe zone is.
Takeaway: Use 3-6 installment plans to smooth cash-flow on considered purchases, but be cautious about long tails.
-
People heavily overweight the present, segment money into mental buckets, and under-track numerous small future debits. Short installment plans and deposits tap into that: A smaller bite feels easier, one or a few future payments are mentally manageable, and refunds or store credit often get spent more freely than paycheck dollars.
Takeaway: Structure terms so they relieve immediate pain without hiding the true total; clear, all-in price disclosure keeps you on the right side of both trust and regulators.
-
Payment timing (deposits, early-pay discounts, milestone billing), risk allocation (performance guarantees, index-linked escalators), scope (service levels, deliverables), and commitment (contract length, renewal caps) all shift economics even when the list price stays fixed.
Takeaway: When a buyer is anchored on a number, move the game to terms – cash flow, risk, and commitment – so you can keep nominal price intact while repairing margin.
-
Deposits and structured payment terms make the most sense in B2B or high-trust B2C settings where both sides care about uptime, capacity, and long-run collaboration, not just the unit sticker. Clear deposit and cancellation policies protect utilization and revenue and signal professionalism when they’re transparent and consistently enforced.
Takeaway: Reach for deposits, milestones, and escalators in recurring or high-commitment relationships; in one-off, low-trust transactions, simplicity and transparency beat clever structures.
OPERATOR CHECKLIST
◻️ We have a written deposit policy (when we require it, typical % band, refund rules) for key products or services.
◻️ For capacity-constrained offerings, we track no-show/cancel rates and margin before vs. after deposit changes.
◻️ We cap installment plans at a short, simple range (e.g., 2-6 payments) unless we’re underwriting credit like a lender.
◻️ Sales has a “price vs. terms” playbook: early-pay trade, scope swap (Bronze/Silver/Gold), term-length trade, and index-linked pass-through.
◻️ Finance can quickly estimate the implied APR of any early-pay discount and compare it to our cost of capital.
◻️ Legal/accounting has signed off on our standard term structures (deposits, refunds, surcharges, escalation clauses).
◻️ We review bottom-decile deals by margin monthly for problematic payment terms, not just discounts.
◻️ Our contracts state a clear “good-til” date and forfeiture rules for deposits and pre-payments.
SIGNAL TO WATCH
If you see high no-show/cancellation rates, cash-flow strain despite strong bookings, or endless haggling on price but no structured discussion of terms, you’re leaving value and control on the table.
ONE QUICK ACTION
Pick one capacity-constrained product or service and pilot a 10%-20% deposit with a clear “good-til” date and cancellation rules instead of another discount. Track: No-shows, rebooking behavior, and net margin vs. the old terms.
COMMON TRAPS
Token deposits (e.g., $50 on a $10k job) that don’t change behavior but add admin friction.
Monster deposits that look like price gouging, crush conversion, or raise regulatory eyebrows.
Advertising “no-interest installments” while burying fees or penalties.
Early-pay discounts offered ad-hoc, with no idea of the implied APR or impact on margin.
Complex milestone schedules that neither side can summarize on one page.
Letting sales invent bespoke payment terms for each deal.
Treating deposits as pure revenue rather than a commitment device, leading to sloppy refund practices and mistrust.
Experiment 1:
DESIGN CANVAS: DEPOSIT
What it’s for: Design or tighten a deposit policy that reduces cancellations/no-shows and protects capacity without creating unfairness or sales friction.
Who it’s for: Ops/GM + Sales/CS lead who owns scheduling/booking/backlog and needs a simple, enforceable deposit rule.
What it does: Match deposit size and refund logic to capacity risk so you’re not eating the cost of indecision.
Use when you need…
Clarity: Links deposit rules to capacity risk (not vibes).
Speed: Produces a testable policy in minutes.
Strategic insight: Shows where indecision is costing you margin/capacity.
Experiment 2:
T-CHART: TERMS-INSTEAD-OF-PRICE
What it’s for: Pre-decide “terms we’ll trade” so Sales can protect price while offering concessions that improve cash flow, risk, or utilization.
Who it’s for: Sales leaders + finance/deal desk who repeatedly face discount asks and want consistent counters.
What it does: Lets you stop negotiating price first so that you’re negotiating terms that preserve value and reduce risk.
Use when you need…
Clarity: Standardizes negotiation posture so reps don’t freestyle discounts.
Speed: Gives ready-to-use counters during deal review.
Strategic insight: Improves cash flow/risk profile without cutting price.
Experiment 3:
HEAT CHECK: INSTALLMENT PLAN
What it’s for: Vet installment plans quickly to avoid hidden credit risk, long collection tails, and administrative drag.
Who it’s for: Sales/finance/ops teams considering offering payment plans for specific SKUs or customer types.
What it does: Allows you to offer installments only when the plan is operationally sane and risk-appropriate.
Use when you need…
Clarity: Makes credit-like risk visible before you launch a plan.
Speed: Quick triage prevents bad installment offers from spreading.
Strategic insight: Forces you to decide whether you’re selling product or financing.
This document is provided solely for general informational and discussion purposes and is intended to offer insight into certain philosophies, principles, and approaches that Permanent Equity may employ when partnering with the management teams of its portfolio companies following an investment. The material is illustrative in nature only and does not describe a required, uniform, or exhaustive set of practices or expectations.
This document is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal, tax, accounting, investment, or other professional advice, nor as creating, modifying, or implying any legal rights, obligations, fiduciary duties, standards of conduct, or contractual commitments. Nothing herein should be relied upon as a substitute for individualized advice or negotiated agreements.
This document does not constitute, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase any securities, investment vehicles, or advisory services. Any such offer or solicitation may be made only pursuant to definitive offering documents and governing agreements, which will contain material information, risk factors, and binding terms that may differ materially from the general concepts described herein.
The practices, decision making frameworks, expectations, and examples referenced in this document are intended solely to illustrate how Permanent Equity may work with certain portfolio companies in certain circumstances. Actual practices vary based on the specific facts, negotiated contractual arrangements, regulatory considerations, industry dynamics, and stage of the business, and may change over time. No representation is made that any approach described herein will apply to any particular company, management team, transaction, or situation.
Nothing in this document should be interpreted as a commitment, promise, guarantee, or assurance regarding autonomy, governance rights, decision making authority, performance outcomes, distributions, returns, or operational results. Past experience, illustrative examples, and general statements of philosophy are not indicative of future results.
Readers should consult their own legal, tax, financial, and other professional advisers regarding the applicability of any concepts described herein to their specific circumstances.
Permanent Equity undertakes no obligation to update or revise this document, and the material may be modified or withdrawn at any time without notice.